GENERAL NEGATIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT SOLVENCY OF PRIVACY PROTECTIONS

YOU HAVE NO PRIVACY, GET OVER IT

WE CANNOT REGAIN OUR LOST PRIVACY WE HAD IN AN EARLIER AMERICA

LOSS OF PRIVACY IS INEVITABLE

PRIVACY IS UNDER ATTACK FROM SO MANY SIDES IT CANNOT SURVIVE

WE HAVE TO GIVE UP DATA EVERY DAY TO SURVIVE

BECAUSE OF THE BROAD ASSAULT ON PRIVACY, NARROW AFFIRMATIVE APPROACHES ARE MEANINGLESS

SINGLE SECTOR PLANS STOP COMPREHENSIVE APPROACHES

TECHNOLOGY MEANS PRIVACY CANNOT BE PROTECTED

ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE MEANS PRIVACY IS OBSOLETE

YOUR PHONE CALLS ARE NOT PRIVATE

TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE MAKES PRIVACY PROTECTION IMPOSSIBLE

LEGISLATIVE APPROACHES TO PRIVACY PROTECTION FAIL

WE NEED TO USE MANY APPROACHES AT ONCE IN ORDER TO SOLVE
[GOOD AS AFFIRMATIVE PERMUTATION EVIDENCE AS WELL]

WE CANNOT PROTECT PRIVACY ON A NATIONAL LEVEL – IT MUST BE INTERNATIONAL

GOVERNMENT WILL BE UNABLE TO ENFORCE PRIVACY REGULATIONS

PROTECTING PRIVACY ON THE INTERNET IS HOPELESS

THE INFORMATION AS PROPERTY APPROACH TO PRIVACY WILL FAIL

CODE OF FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICE IS UNACCEPTABLE AS A PRIVACY PROTECTING MECHANISM

AFFIRMATIVE CANNOT PROTECT PRIVACY BECAUSE THEY CANNOT PROVIDE ANONYMITY