Home

Connecticut 

Number of victims 

 

557 people were sterilized up to 1963, of whom 92% were female.  74% were considered mentally ill and 26% were deemed “mentally deficient.” 

 

Period during which sterilizations occurred

 

Sterilizations in Connecticut began after the passage of the state’s sterilization law in 1909 and lasted until around 1963. The two major period of sterilizations were between 1920 and 1929 and 1930 and 1940 (including the peak period 1930-1932), when 173/218 operations were performed.

 

Temporal pattern of sterilizations and rate of sterilization

 

 Picture of a graph of eugenic sterilizations in Connecticut

Although Connecticut’s sterilization law was passed in 1909, sterilization was not implemented on a larger scale until the early 1920s. In the 1920s, the 1930s, and the early 1940s there were on average about 20 sterilizations per year.  Although people continued to be sterilized, the numbers were not as high after 1943 (Paul, p. 304). During the peak period 1930-1932, the rate of sterilization per year per 100,000 residents was about 3.

Passage of law(s)

 

The Connecticut sterilization statute was passed on August 12, 1909, and concerned “operations for the prevention of procreation” (Laughlin, p. 19).  It was one of the shortest sterilization laws in the country (Paul, p. 295).  The law allowed for the sterilization of certain patients in the state hospitals for the insane at Middletown and Norwich.  The locations for operations extended to the Mansfield State Training School and Hospital at Mansfield Depot in a 1919 amendment (Laughlin, p. 20).  On July 1, 1965, the governor signed a bill that replaced the word oophorectomy with tubal surgery and required consent of an individual prior to the operation.  Under this new law, a “competent” person who gives consent of her own surgery must also have the written consent of “‘the responsible next of kin or guardian of such persons or, if there is none, with the approval of the board of trustees of the institution’” (Paul, p. 299).

 

Groups identified in the law

 

The original law included “inmates of State prisons and State Hospitals at Middletown and Norwich” and who “would produce children with and inherited tendency to crime, insanity, feeble-mindedness, idiocy, or imbecility” (Laughlin, pp. 8, 20).

 

Process of the law

 

Three surgeons would examine the mental and physical capabilities of the individuals at hand, consider the person’s chances of improvement, examine his or her family history, and weigh the chances of negative procreation.  The board would then come to a decision about whether or not sterilization was necessary.  Females who were ordered to be sterilized underwent oophorectomy (removal of the ovaries) while males were sent to have vasectomies (Laughlin, p. 8; Paul, p. 298). 

 

Precipitating factors and processes

 

In Connecticut in the early 19th century, “enlightenment humanism, republic civic concern, and religious enthusiasm” spread the idea that asylums were an effective way to improve the behavior of mentally and physically challenged individuals.  This idea led to the creation of the American School for the Deaf in 1817 and the Retreat for the Insane in 1824 in Hartford.  However, patients in these facilities did not produce the expected results after taking part in various levels of education, and connections between diseases in different generations in families were made (Goodheart, pp. 93, 96). In the late 1800s concerns about the dangers of the “feeble minded” class were voiced in the context of mass immigration, urbanization, and labor unrest, combined with an economic depression in 1893 (Goodheart, p. 105). This fear of “degeneracy” led to the passing of the eugenic marriage restriction law in 1895 (see below) and preceded the passing of the eugenic sterilization law.

 

Groups targeted and victimized

 

Paupers, criminals, and idiots were targeted because the society did not want to see an increase in the number of people in these groups (Goodheart, p. 107).

 

Other restrictions places on those identified in the law or with disabilities in general

 

An Act Concerning Crimes and Punishments was passed in 1895. It banned the marriage of “epileptics, imbeciles, and the feebleminded” (Goodheart, p. 106). Additionally, men who had sexual intercourse with these same victimized groups of women would be fined $1,000 and sent to prison (Goodheart, p. 107).

 

Major proponents

 

Dr. George H. Knight undoubtedly shaped the eugenics movement in Connecticut.  He was a proponent of colonies for the “feebleminded” and encouraged confining and segregating “the custodial class” (Goodheart, pp. 102-104).  He played a role in an epileptic asylum and worked to pass An Act Concerning Crimes and Punishments, which, among other restrictions, prohibited disabled people from marrying (Goodheart, p. 106).  He preached eugenics to various audiences and expressed how education in asylums, as presented by his father, was not an effective solution to the problems of the disabled (Goodheart, p. 107).  He supported the passing of Connecticut’s sterilization law in 1909 (Goodheart, p. 109).

 

“Feeder institutions” and institutions where sterilization were performed

  

Picture of the Norwich State Hospital (Photo origin: abandonedbutnotforgotten.com; available at http://www.abandonedbutnotforgotten.com/norwich_state_hospital_sub_pics.htm)

 

The Norwich State Hospital housed the mentally ill beginning in 1904 and had 3,180 patients by the 1950s. All eugenic sterilizations in Connecticut until the end of 1920 happened there, and almost all until 1925. The facility closed in 1996 and is abandoned (Opacity). 

 

Picture of the Middletown State Hospital (Photo origin: rootsweb.com; available at http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~asylums/connecticut_ct/index.html)

 

Sterilization operations also occurred in the Middletown State Hospital. The Middletown State Hospital in Middletown, CT, later renamed the Connecticut Valley Hospital, was founded as an insane asylum in 1868.  Currently it contains a psychiatric region, a forensic area, and a substance abuse assistance division (Rootsweb). 

 

Picture of the Southbury Training School (Photo origin: http://2007newenglandtrip.blogspot.com/2008/03/southbury-connecticut.html)

 

Almost all sterilizations after World War II took place in the Southbury Training School (Paul, p. 306 n. 5), which was an institution for mentally challenged individuals.  A total of at least 60 people were sterilized in this facility after World War II (Paul, p. 303), which presently is a facility that has 696 residents and is located in Southbury, CT (Kasprak). Julius Paul notes that, in fact, “many requests for sterilizations [were] refused because the children do not fall into the category of familial mental retardation” (p. 296).

 

The Mansfield State Training School and Hospital was also a place where sterilizations were performed, but the number of sterilizations was apparently very small, due to the fact that a former superintendent only once consented to such an operation on a resident (see Paul, p. 310 n. 17). The facility closed in 1993 (Connecticut State Library).

 

The sources used for this research did not include any information about the facilities’ eugenic pasts or use of sterilization methods.

Opposition

The Connecticut sterilization laws were not as drastic as those drawn up in other states, partly due to the high levels of opposition that the proponents faced. They dealt with religious group opposition that is reported for the early period (Paul, p. 310 n. 14), the concern over court reviews of a sterilization law that provided procedural safeguards and appeal process, and early on also the reluctance of some leaders of institutions to participate (see Paul, p. 301).

Bibliography

Connecticut State Library. “The Mansfield Training School and Hospital.” Available at < http://www.cslib.org/agencies/MansfieldstatetrainingSchool.htm>

Goodheart, Lawrence B. 2004. “Rethinking Mental Retardation: Education and Eugenics in Connecticut, 1818-1917.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 59: 90-111.

Kasprak, John.  2000. “Southbury Training School.” OLR Research Report. Available at <http://www.cga.ct.gov/2000/rpt/olr/htm/2000-r-0103.htm>.

Laughlin, Harry H.  1922. Eugenical Sterilization in the United States. Chicago: Psychopathic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago.

Opacity: Urban Ruins. “Norwich State Hospital.”  Available at <http://www.opacity.us/site64_norwich_state_hospital.htm>.

Paul, Julius. 1965. “‘Three Generations of Imbeciles Are Enough’: State Eugenic Sterilization Laws in American Thought and Practice.”  Washington, D.S.: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

Rootsweb. “Connecticut State Hospital.” Available at <http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~asylums/connecticut_ct/index.html>.