PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT PRIVACY

WORKPLACE DRUG TESTING AFFIRMATIVE

WORKPLACE DRUG TESTING IS PERVASIVE

WORKPLACE DRUG TESTING VIOLATES PRIVACY

VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

DESTROYS THE LIVES OF WORKERS

REINFORCES THE WAR ON DRUGS

WAR ON DRUGS CAUSES HUGE HARMS

CURRENT LAWS ARE INADEQUATE TO PROTECT WORKERS

END OF WORKPLACE DRUG TESTING WOULD BE ACCEPTED AND SUCCESSFUL

DISADVANTAGE ANSWERS

 

WORKPLACE SPYING AFFIRMATIVE

MANY COMPANIES SPY ON THEIR EMPLOYEES

EXTENT OF WORKPLACE SPYING IS GROWING DEEPER

WORKPLACE SPYING IS GROWING IN SIZE

WORKPLACE SPYING SERIOUSLY INFRINGES ON WORKER PRIVACY

PRIVATE MATTERS ARE USED AGAINST WORKERS BY EMPLOYERS

WORKPLACE SPYING HARMS WORKERS PERSONALLY

WORKPLACE SPYING HURTS WORKER PRODUCTIVITY

POLITICAL CLIMATE HAS WEAKENED WORKPLACE PRIVACY

CURRENT LAWS ARE INADEQUATE

COURT ACTION FAILS TO PROTECT WORKERS

STATE LAWS ARE INADEQUATE

SOLVENCY

 

WORKPLACE GENETIC SCREENING AFFIRMATIVE

WORKPLACE GENETIC SCREENING IS INCREASING

GENETIC TESTING PROVIDES EMPLOYERS WITH UNRELIABLE AND INACCURATE DATA

GENETIC TESTING OF EMPLOYEES LEADS TO INVASIONS OF PRIVACY

GENETIC SCREENING IS USED TO DISCRIMINATE

GENETIC SCREENING FOR EMPLOYMENT CAUSES PEOPLE TO AVOID GETTING NEEDED TESTS

GENETIC SCREENING FOR EMPLOYMENT IS UNREGULATED

FEDERAL LAWS ARE INADEQUATE

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IS INADEQUATE

EEOC/TITLE SEVEN IS INADEQUATE

HIPAA STATUTE IS INADEQUATE

STATE LAWS ARE INADEQUATE

NEED STRICT CONTROLS TO PROTECT WORKERS

FEDERAL ACTION IS NEEDED

CODE FOR RESPONSIBLE GENETICS

NEW PROTECTIONS WILL BE EFFECTIVE

 

NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS AGAINST WORKPLACE PRIVACY PROTECTION

HARMS OF WORKPLACE SPYING ARE EXAGGERATED

THERE IS NO RECOGNIZED RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE WORKPLACE

WORKPLACE SPYING ONLY TAKES PLACE WHEN THERE IS A GOOD JUSTIFICATION

VERY LITTLE DRUG TESTING GOES ON

TESTING JUSTIFIED BY DRUG DAMAGES IN THE WORKPLACE

TESTING JUSTIFIED TO PROTECT FROM ACCIDENTS AND FATALITIES

TESTING JUSTIFIED BECAUSE IT HELPS DRUG ADDICTS RECEIVE REHABILITATION

LITTLE GENETIC SCREENING GOES ON

PROTECTED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

IT PROTECTS PEOPLE FROM JOBS WHICH MIGHT KILL THEM

NO SOLVENCY UNLESS PRIVACY OF ALL MEDICAL RECORDS IS COVERED

 

CRITIQUE OF WORK

SHELL - WORK CRITIQUE

WORK: DEFINITION AND HISTORY

ANTI-WORK STORY

WORK IS NOT A FAIR EXCHANGE BETWEEN EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE

IMPACT: WORK IS THE GREATEST SOURCE OF HUMAN MISERY

IMPACT: END OF SEXUAL OPPRESSION LINKED TO WORK

IMPACT: WORK KILLS MILLIONS -- IT IS MURDER & GENOCIDE

IMPACT: WORK IS PART-TIME SLAVERY

IMPACT: OUR WORK SOCIETY MAKES A MOCKERY OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY

IMPACT: WORK DEGRADES ALL SOCIAL RELATIONS

IMPACT: WORK CAUSES ECOLOGICAL DISASTERS

IMPACT: END OF WORK SPARKS NEW HUMAN CREATIVITY

ANTI-WORK FORCES ARE A SOCIAL MOVEMENT WAITING TO BE AWAKENED BY OUR CRITIQUE

SOLVENCY: TRANSITION WILL BE EASED BY COOPERATION FROM MANY

SOLVENCY: CHARGES OF UTOPIANISM ARE GROUNDLESS

SOLVENCY: REPLACEMENT OF WAGE SLAVERY IS FEASIBLE

SOLVENCY: "PLAY" CAN REPLACE "WORK"

SOLVENCY: CRITIQUE DOESN’T HAVE TO OVERTURN THE WORK SYSTEM TO BE WORTH VOTING FOR

SOLVENCY: WE WON’T HAVE TO OVER-RELY ON TECHNOLOGY

SOLVENCY: PEOPLE DO NOT DESIRE TO WORK

SOLVENCY: WORK DOES NOT CREATE HAPPINESS -- UNEMPLOYMENT IS GOOD

ANSWERS TO WORK CRITIQUE

ANSWERS: ANTI-WORK POSITION IS ILLOGICAL AND UNTENABLE

ANSWER: ANTI-WORK POSITION IS IMPRACTICAL

ANSWER: WORK IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MUTUAL CONCERN

ANSWER: TURN - NO JOBS MEAN MORE WORK

ANSWER: WORK CREATES INTELLECTUAL GROWTH

 

EMPLOYMENT CASE TURNS

PRIVACY CONTROLS STOP MEDICAL MOVEMENTS, WHICH ARE THE REAL SOLUTION

EMPLOYERS WILL JUST DIG DEEPER FOR OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION

EMPLOYERS HAVE JUSTIFICATION FOR SPYING

NURSING HOME EMPLOYEES MUST BE INVESTIGATED TO PROTECT THE ELDERLY