NEGATIVE NUCLEAR

Here are a vareiety of arguments and attacks to use when the affirmative is calling for changes in policy towards nuclear weapons. Make sure to match the arguments up with affirmative cases they directly apply to.

NUCLEAR WEAPONS

MILITARY SOLUTIONS ARE LESS LIKELY NOW THAN IN THE PAST

WAR IS NOT A SERIOUS THREAT IN THE STATUS QUO

BUSH ADMINISTRATION NUCLEAR POLICY IS VERY GOOD

NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS ARE NOT A SERIOUS RISK

ARMS CONTROL STRATEGY IS AN UNWISE OPTION

RUSSIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS WILL NOT BE A MAJOR THREAT IN THE STATUS QUO

NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION

PROLIFERATION OF WMD SYSTEMS IS EXAGGERATED AND ACTUALLY SLOWING

CURRENT EFFORTS TO COMBAT NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION ARE EXCELLENT

NEW EFFORTS AGAINST NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION WILL FAIL

WE MUST ACCEPT NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND LEARN TO MANAGE IT

THREATS OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL FROM RUSSIA AND CHINA ARE UNREALISTIC

INDIA AND PAKISTAN ARE NOT A NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION THREAT

| Table of Contents | Background | Definitions | Affirmative | Negative | Counterplan | Disadvantages | Critiques|