DISADVANTAGE USA LEADERSHIP

Often affirmative cases will claim that they enhance USA global leadership, or that other nations will follow USA lead on the plan. In any case, you should use that claim against them, and argue that USA leadership is harmful to us and others.

NOW IS A CRITICAL TURNING POINT FOR USA’S ROLE IN THE WORLD

USA LEADERSHIP IS ON-BALANCE HARMFUL

USA SUSTAINED LEADERSHIP UNITES THE WORLD AGAINST IT

USA LEADERSHIP MAKES AMERICA A TARGET FOR WMD TERRORISM

USA UNILATERALISM IS A BAD EXERCISE OF LEADERSHIP

ISOLATIONISM SCENARIO

BEST USA POLICY IS ONE OF COOPERATION, NOT LEADERSHIP

ANSWER: THERE IS NO USA LEADERSHIP NOW

EUROPE AND THE USA WILL CONTINUE AS CLOSE PARTNERS

USA LEADERSHIP ALLOWS RUSSIA TO BE ADVENTUROUS USING COPY CAT HEGEMONY

INTERNATIONAL LAW CRIPPLES USA GLOBAL AUTHORITY

| Table of Contents | Background | Definitions | Affirmative | Negative | Counterplan | Disadvantages | Critiques|