DISADVANTAGE BIPARTISANSHIP


This disadvantage argues that a delicate spirit of bipartisanship (the two parties working together) now exists in USA foreign policy. Passing a contentious proposal like the affirmative will disrupt this concensus, which is essential to good USA foreign policy.

Please realize that this argument is very "date sensitive" and in order to use it you will have to do constant updating to provide brink, uniqueness, and link evidence.



UNIQUENESS: WE WILL HAVE A BIPARTISAN FOREIGN POLICY IN THE STATUS QUO

LINK: NMD DESTROYS BIPARTISANSHIP

LINK: ANGERING REPUBLICANS DESTROYS BIPARTISANSHIP

LINK: POLITICAL ACTION DAMAGES BIPARTISANSHIP

LINK: USA SUCCESSFUL FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT DAMAGES BIPARTISANSHIP

IMPACT: FOREIGN POLICY BIPARTISANSHIP IS ESSENTIAL

ANSWER: FOREIGN POLICY BIPARTISANSHIP WILL CONTINUE


| Table of Contents | Background | Definitions | Affirmative | Negative | Counterplan | Disadvantages | Critiques|